<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.9.1 is around the corner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: miqrogroove</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>miqrogroove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Ah I see now that bug does affect the 2.8 branch, even though it was marked 2.9.  So it is &quot;only&quot; a critical bug that has gone unfixed for many versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I see now that bug does affect the 2.8 branch, even though it was marked 2.9.  So it is &#034;only&#034; a critical bug that has gone unfixed for many versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1412&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;miqrogroove&lt;/a&gt;: I don&#039;t think that #11145 is that much of a deal breaker, to be honest. I think it always has been that way.

I do agree that the bugs definitely need a lot to be more attention than they currently do, though. But on this front, I&#039;ve lost most of the hopes I had in 2009. Maybe 2010 will prove me wrong? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-1412" rel="nofollow">miqrogroove</a>: I don&#039;t think that #11145 is that much of a deal breaker, to be honest. I think it always has been that way.</p>
<p>I do agree that the bugs definitely need a lot to be more attention than they currently do, though. But on this front, I&#039;ve lost most of the hopes I had in 2009. Maybe 2010 will prove me wrong? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miqrogroove</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>miqrogroove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 06:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1412</guid>
		<description>So 2.9.1 is out, and as predicted I ended up not testing the release candidate because there has been no action on my bug reports from previous versions.  When bugs don&#039;t get fixed, I don&#039;t waste my time reporting them.

Working on the critical patches was rewarding because I could see the benefit for the whole community.  Maybe this release on a Monday is a sign that the core team has learned from their previous weekend abandonment release.

I did put my 2 public plugins into a copy of RC1 to make sure they worked.  The next step is to re-evaluate my 2.9.2 site upgrade target.  I&#039;m starting to wonder if #11145 will be a deal breaker.  A broken Save button is considered a critical issue by most sane bloggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So 2.9.1 is out, and as predicted I ended up not testing the release candidate because there has been no action on my bug reports from previous versions.  When bugs don&#039;t get fixed, I don&#039;t waste my time reporting them.</p>
<p>Working on the critical patches was rewarding because I could see the benefit for the whole community.  Maybe this release on a Monday is a sign that the core team has learned from their previous weekend abandonment release.</p>
<p>I did put my 2 public plugins into a copy of RC1 to make sure they worked.  The next step is to re-evaluate my 2.9.2 site upgrade target.  I&#039;m starting to wonder if #11145 will be a deal breaker.  A broken Save button is considered a critical issue by most sane bloggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee &#124; Money4Invest</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee &#124; Money4Invest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see Wordpress 2.9.1 released and I&#039;m going to upgrade because I&#039;ve been sufferred with scheduled posts issues since upgrade to 2.9. I hope this time all the big issues will be fixed permanently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m glad to see Wordpress 2.9.1 released and I&#039;m going to upgrade because I&#039;ve been sufferred with scheduled posts issues since upgrade to 2.9. I hope this time all the big issues will be fixed permanently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>I hopen 2.9.1 comes out soon... i always tell everyone i know who uses wordpress (which admittedly isn&#039;t many people) to _never_ upgrade to a brand new major version (2.7, 2.8 etc) and to wait for the X.1 release. This is even more important if you&#039;re a podcaster- i&#039;ve seen some podcasters totally unable to release new episodes because of incompatible plugins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hopen 2.9.1 comes out soon&#8230; i always tell everyone i know who uses wordpress (which admittedly isn&#039;t many people) to _never_ upgrade to a brand new major version (2.7, 2.8 etc) and to wait for the X.1 release. This is even more important if you&#039;re a podcaster- i&#039;ve seen some podcasters totally unable to release new episodes because of incompatible plugins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1358</guid>
		<description>&quot;It seems like half of the core staff are open-minded, and the other half are hell-bent on adding new features at the expense of not fixing the features that are broken.&quot;

I think that the more general problem is that we need one or two bug fix/re-engineering releases before we seriously start thinking about adding new features. But I can&#039;t picture that happening any time soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;It seems like half of the core staff are open-minded, and the other half are hell-bent on adding new features at the expense of not fixing the features that are broken.&#034;</p>
<p>I think that the more general problem is that we need one or two bug fix/re-engineering releases before we seriously start thinking about adding new features. But I can&#039;t picture that happening any time soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miqrogroove</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>miqrogroove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t sure.  It seems like half of the core staff are open-minded, and the other half are hell-bent on adding new features at the expense of not fixing the features that are broken.  They take it as far as rejecting bug reports on new features that are still in beta.  Depending how things play out in the field of plugins, there could be substantial momentum building for a 2.8.7 fork.

I&#039;m still on a heavily-patched copy of 2.8.4, and I&#039;ve just finished a massive plugin called Tag Groups for hierarchical tag management.  The odds of it being compatible with the 2.9 branch are close to zero at this point, so I&#039;m going to need a lot of motivation to upgrade that thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#039;t sure.  It seems like half of the core staff are open-minded, and the other half are hell-bent on adding new features at the expense of not fixing the features that are broken.  They take it as far as rejecting bug reports on new features that are still in beta.  Depending how things play out in the field of plugins, there could be substantial momentum building for a 2.8.7 fork.</p>
<p>I&#039;m still on a heavily-patched copy of 2.8.4, and I&#039;ve just finished a massive plugin called Tag Groups for hierarchical tag management.  The odds of it being compatible with the 2.9 branch are close to zero at this point, so I&#039;m going to need a lot of motivation to upgrade that thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>Oh come on, you weren&#039;t expecting &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; to change a thing in the development process, were you? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh come on, you weren&#039;t expecting <em>that</em> to change a thing in the development process, were you? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miqrogroove</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>miqrogroove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>So it gets &quot;wontfix&quot;, I waste a bunch of time trying to argue that the bug is (blatantly) valid, and ultimately I stop testing that version because my reports are still being rejected.  Now we see clearly that the &quot;Setting Scope&quot; discussion has gone nowhere.  WordPress continues with its &quot;Crash &amp; Burn&quot; policy on new patches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it gets &#034;wontfix&#034;, I waste a bunch of time trying to argue that the bug is (blatantly) valid, and ultimately I stop testing that version because my reports are still being rejected.  Now we see clearly that the &#034;Setting Scope&#034; discussion has gone nowhere.  WordPress continues with its &#034;Crash &amp; Burn&#034; policy on new patches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/12/29/wordpress-2-9-1-is-around-the-corner/#comment-1307</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2343#comment-1307</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1297&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;miqrogroove&lt;/a&gt;: Heh, we&#039;ve lived with that particular bug for years. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-1297" rel="nofollow">miqrogroove</a>: Heh, we&#039;ve lived with that particular bug for years. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

