<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Semiologic skins round 2, and WP 2.8.6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-945</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-939&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rusty Moore&lt;/a&gt;: It wouldn&#039;t look 100% the same, but it would nonetheless look very similar with the classic/silver skin (the gray would be slightly brighter).

You might also need to change the header image&#039;s width slightly (to 750px from 770px if applicable).

Don&#039;t wait too long to upgrade, too... There *are* worms around that target old WP installs.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-939" rel="nofollow">Rusty Moore</a>: It wouldn&#039;t look 100% the same, but it would nonetheless look very similar with the classic/silver skin (the gray would be slightly brighter).</p>
<p>You might also need to change the header image&#039;s width slightly (to 750px from 770px if applicable).</p>
<p>Don&#039;t wait too long to upgrade, too&#8230; There *are* worms around that target old WP installs.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-939</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-939</guid>
		<description>Dennis,

Question for you (considering buying the Pro version)

I think I have an old version of Semiologic on my high traffic Fitness Blog.

http://fitnessblackbook.com

I believe this was a customized version of Semiologic that the guys over at AuthoritySiteCenter.com were using to install blogs for their members.

I Love my theme and it is kicking butt. I am getting 5,000-7,000 unique visitors per day and I don&#039;t want to change the look at all. 

Would it be possible to take the new version of Semiolgic Pro and keep my blog looking 100% the same.

The reason I ask is that the version I am using hasn&#039;t been upgraded in years and now that I have upgraded to the newest version of WP...I am experiencing a lot of strange bugs and errors.

Any help would be appreciated! I don&#039;t want to go with any of the &quot;noisy&quot; themes on the internet.

Cheers,

Rusty Moore</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dennis,</p>
<p>Question for you (considering buying the Pro version)</p>
<p>I think I have an old version of Semiologic on my high traffic Fitness Blog.</p>
<p><a  href="http://fitnessblackbook.com" rel="nofollow">http://fitnessblackbook.com</a></p>
<p>I believe this was a customized version of Semiologic that the guys over at AuthoritySiteCenter.com were using to install blogs for their members.</p>
<p>I Love my theme and it is kicking butt. I am getting 5,000-7,000 unique visitors per day and I don&#039;t want to change the look at all. </p>
<p>Would it be possible to take the new version of Semiolgic Pro and keep my blog looking 100% the same.</p>
<p>The reason I ask is that the version I am using hasn&#039;t been upgraded in years and now that I have upgraded to the newest version of WP&#8230;I am experiencing a lot of strange bugs and errors.</p>
<p>Any help would be appreciated! I don&#039;t want to go with any of the &#034;noisy&#034; themes on the internet.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Rusty Moore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-934</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-931&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mark&lt;/a&gt;: duh, woops! :-D

Will get this fixed later today. I need to test Version Checker RC6 a tiny bit more before releasing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-931" rel="nofollow">mark</a>: duh, woops! :-D</p>
<p>Will get this fixed later today. I need to test Version Checker RC6 a tiny bit more before releasing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-933</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-932&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Teddy Wu&lt;/a&gt;: A support ticket would be a better place to report this.

(FWIW, though, blank screens usually are out of memory issues. And the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/exploit-scanner/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Exploit scanner&lt;/a&gt; may come in handy if you&#039;re suspecting you got hacked.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-932" rel="nofollow">Teddy Wu</a>: A support ticket would be a better place to report this.</p>
<p>(FWIW, though, blank screens usually are out of memory issues. And the <a  href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/exploit-scanner/" rel="nofollow">Exploit scanner</a> may come in handy if you&#039;re suspecting you got hacked.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddy Wu</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Teddy Wu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 05:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-932</guid>
		<description>Hi, currently all my blog turn into blank pages. I have more then a dozen of them. I understand that is due to wp 2.8.5 security issue, and after research there is a backdoor loophole for this security issue. 

I was told to do a upgrade to 2.8.6 version to solve the security issue.

Please advice
Teddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, currently all my blog turn into blank pages. I have more then a dozen of them. I understand that is due to wp 2.8.5 security issue, and after research there is a backdoor loophole for this security issue. </p>
<p>I was told to do a upgrade to 2.8.6 version to solve the security issue.</p>
<p>Please advice<br />
Teddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-931</guid>
		<description>As Bruce mentioned, that Nov 14 version of sem-pro is all old stuff.
It contains WP 2.8.4 and over a dozen of outdated plugins and themes.
The newest file is dated Oct.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Bruce mentioned, that Nov 14 version of sem-pro is all old stuff.<br />
It contains WP 2.8.4 and over a dozen of outdated plugins and themes.<br />
The newest file is dated Oct.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-928</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-926&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bruce Bird&lt;/a&gt;: Odd... well, the advertised change date for that zip is junk. I merely forgot to change it in the database. It contains 2.8.6, too (I&#039;m using it on this site).

At any rate, don&#039;t worry about it: it&#039;s a mere matter of days before I release Version Checker 2.0. That one will stick to installing Sem Pro, and then worry about theme and plugin upgrades only, rather than Sem Pro upgrades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a  href="#comment-926" rel="nofollow">Bruce Bird</a>: Odd&#8230; well, the advertised change date for that zip is junk. I merely forgot to change it in the database. It contains 2.8.6, too (I&#039;m using it on this site).</p>
<p>At any rate, don&#039;t worry about it: it&#039;s a mere matter of days before I release Version Checker 2.0. That one will stick to installing Sem Pro, and then worry about theme and plugin upgrades only, rather than Sem Pro upgrades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2009/11/13/new-semiologic-skins-round-2-and-wp-2-8-6/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/?p=2217#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Denis
There is a conflict between what you say about WP 2.8.6 being included in current zip - (which is still labelled as Oct 5th) - and what is happening when I upgrade with Version Checker 2.0.rc5 - which leaves my sites at WP 2.8.4.

Regards
Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denis<br />
There is a conflict between what you say about WP 2.8.6 being included in current zip &#8211; (which is still labelled as Oct 5th) &#8211; and what is happening when I upgrade with Version Checker 2.0.rc5 &#8211; which leaves my sites at WP 2.8.4.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

