<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semiologic.com/2005/01/27/aoccdrnig-to-a-rscheearch-at-cmabrigde-uinervtisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2005/01/27/aoccdrnig-to-a-rscheearch-at-cmabrigde-uinervtisy/</link>
	<description>Meaningful Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:23:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis de Bernardy</title>
		<link>http://www.semiologic.com/2005/01/27/aoccdrnig-to-a-rscheearch-at-cmabrigde-uinervtisy/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis de Bernardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semiologic.com/2005/01/27/aoccdrnig-to-a-rscheearch-at-cmabrigde-uinervtisy/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Moreover:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Nreuuoms pmeeononnhs peossss uiapocmltecnd etaaoilxnpn; nwttdtsniinoahg, the pdseuo-snfiiiectc spssliiimtm is not snfiiiectc and eieecndvs are oetfn mdanleiisg.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Or rather:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Numerous phenomenons possess uncomplicated explanation; notwithstanding, the pseudo-scientific simplistism is not scientific and evidences are often misleading.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Courtesy of Guillaume Fon Sing, linguist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Nreuuoms pmeeononnhs peossss uiapocmltecnd etaaoilxnpn; nwttdtsniinoahg, the pdseuo-snfiiiectc spssliiimtm is not snfiiiectc and eieecndvs are oetfn mdanleiisg.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Or rather:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Numerous phenomenons possess uncomplicated explanation; notwithstanding, the pseudo-scientific simplistism is not scientific and evidences are often misleading.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Courtesy of Guillaume Fon Sing, linguist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

